A Time-Series Investigation of Government Revenue & Expenditure Dynamics in Zimbabwe Using Causality and Variance Decomposition Techniques

Authors

  • Brian Basvi Mananga Business School, Mbabane, Swaziland Author
  • Moryden Moven Komboni Bindura University of Science and Technology, Bindura, Zimbabwe Author
  • S. Makurumidze University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64229/vsxnmz35

Keywords:

Budget Deficit, Government Revenue, Government Expenditure, Fiscal Synchronization, Causality Analysis, Granger Causality

Abstract

The causal relationship between government revenue and government expenditure remains a cornerstone issue in public finance, especially within the context of fiscal sustainability and macroeconomic stability in developing economies. This study investigates the direction and strength of causality between government revenue and expenditure in Zimbabwe, a country characterized by persistent fiscal imbalances, structural economic challenges, and institutional fragilities. Between 2010 and 2022, Zimbabwe recorded an average budget deficit of -4.2% of GDP, with a peak deficit of over -11% in 2018, driven largely by unbudgeted public sector wage increases and quasi-fiscal activities. While total revenues have risen ZWL$1.7 trillion was collected in 2022 against a target of ZWL$1.3 trillion expenditures have consistently outpaced revenues, reaching ZWL$2.1 trillion in the same year. This has led to widening fiscal gaps financed through inflationary domestic borrowing, exacerbating macroeconomic vulnerabilities. The study explores the relevance of four dominant fiscal hypotheses: the tax-spend, spend-tax, fiscal synchronization, and institutional separation frameworks. Employing time-series econometric techniques, including the Toda-Yamamoto Granger Causality Test, ARDL Bounds Testing, and Variance Decomposition Analysis, the study utilizes annual data from 1990 to 2024, while controlling for inflation, public debt, and real GDP growth. It also critically engages with empirical evidence from other African economies and re-evaluates earlier Zimbabwean studies that failed to account for structural breaks and monetary policy spill overs. The findings aim to inform ongoing fiscal reform efforts under the Transitional Stabilization Programme (TSP) and National Development Strategy 1 (NDS1), providing actionable policy insights on whether Zimbabwe should prioritize revenue enhancement, enforce fiscal discipline, or adopt a harmonized approach to public financial management to curb its chronic budget deficits and ensure sustainable development.

References

[1]Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

[2]AbuAl-Foul, B., & Baghestani, H. (2004). The causal relation between government revenue and spending: Evidence from Egypt and Jordan. Journal of Economics and Finance, 28(2), 260-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02761616

[3]Afonso, A., & Rault, C. (2009). Budgetary and external imbalances relationship: A panel data diagnostic. Economic Modelling, 26(4), 781-793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2009.03.006

[4]Baghestani, H., & McNown, R. (1994). Do revenues or expenditures respond to budgetary disequilibria? Southern Economic Journal, 61(2), 311-322. https://doi.org/10.2307/1060160

[5]Barua, S. (2005). An examination of revenue and expenditure causality in Bangladesh: 1974-2004. Bangladesh Bank Policy Analysis Unit Working Paper Series WP, 605.

[6]Carneiro, F., Faria, J. R., & Barry, B. S. (2004). Government revenues and expenditures in Guinea-Bissau: Causality and cointegration. African Development Review, 16(1), 13-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8268.2004.00002.x

[7]Zimbabwe Ministry of Finance. (2024). National Budget Statement 2024. Harare: Government Printers.

[8]Zimbabwe Ministry of Finance. (2025). Zimbabwe National Budget Highlights 2025. Harare: Government Printers.

[9]Government of Zimbabwe (GOZ). (2018). Budget Statements. Government Printers, Harare.

[10]Wolde-Rufael, Y. (2009). Energy consumption and economic growth: The experience of African countries revisited. Energy Economics, 31(2), 217-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.09.005

[11]Musgrave, R. (1966). Principles of budget determination. In Public Finance: Selected Readings (pp. 15-27). Richard D. Irwin.

[12]Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 914-927. https://doi.org/10.1086/261002

[13]Peacock, A. T., & Wiseman, J. (1961). Front matter. In The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom (pp. 3-20). Princeton University Press.

[14]Moalusi, D. K. (2007). Causal link between government spending and revenue: A case study of Botswana. Fordham University, Department of Economics.

[15]Rezaei, A. A. (2015). Tax-spend, spend-tax or fiscal synchronization hypothesis: Evidence from Iran. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 10(3), 844-853.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-15

Issue

Section

Articles